<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Everybody Ought to Know About Digital Photo Retouching</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inspiredm.com/2009/11/17/what-everybody-ought-to-know-about-digital-photo-retouching/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inspiredm.com/2009/11/17/what-everybody-ought-to-know-about-digital-photo-retouching/</link>
	<description>daily web inspiration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:35:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CyberGus</title>
		<link>http://www.inspiredm.com/2009/11/17/what-everybody-ought-to-know-about-digital-photo-retouching/comment-page-1/#comment-14346</link>
		<dc:creator>CyberGus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 18:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspiredm.com/?p=4428#comment-14346</guid>
		<description>An important thing to note:

Real professional photographers need less retouch because they do most of the work at the shooting, that means; great lighting, great makeup, the right angle, a model that do not need tons or retouching.

Other hard fact is:

This post/article talks about &quot;photographers&quot; and that is a wrong perception, the correct approach is: SOME photographers, more those in fashion and advertising, need to achieve some results in order to sell some services, product or ideas.

So, is not that digital photographers need or is a must to retouch. Instead there are some not so good amateur photographers that need to repair the lack of talent in the digital darkroom.

A smart retouch is exactly what you really need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An important thing to note:</p>
<p>Real professional photographers need less retouch because they do most of the work at the shooting, that means; great lighting, great makeup, the right angle, a model that do not need tons or retouching.</p>
<p>Other hard fact is:</p>
<p>This post/article talks about &#8220;photographers&#8221; and that is a wrong perception, the correct approach is: SOME photographers, more those in fashion and advertising, need to achieve some results in order to sell some services, product or ideas.</p>
<p>So, is not that digital photographers need or is a must to retouch. Instead there are some not so good amateur photographers that need to repair the lack of talent in the digital darkroom.</p>
<p>A smart retouch is exactly what you really need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Stafford</title>
		<link>http://www.inspiredm.com/2009/11/17/what-everybody-ought-to-know-about-digital-photo-retouching/comment-page-1/#comment-11404</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Stafford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspiredm.com/?p=4428#comment-11404</guid>
		<description>Great post. The best retouching work is the kind that you can&#039;t even notice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. The best retouching work is the kind that you can&#8217;t even notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dot Blog. The week in links 23/11/09</title>
		<link>http://www.inspiredm.com/2009/11/17/what-everybody-ought-to-know-about-digital-photo-retouching/comment-page-1/#comment-11172</link>
		<dc:creator>dot Blog. The week in links 23/11/09</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspiredm.com/?p=4428#comment-11172</guid>
		<description>[...] What Everyone Ought To Know About Digital Photo Retouching (inspiredm.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What Everyone Ought To Know About Digital Photo Retouching (inspiredm.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene G. Cepeda</title>
		<link>http://www.inspiredm.com/2009/11/17/what-everybody-ought-to-know-about-digital-photo-retouching/comment-page-1/#comment-11122</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene G. Cepeda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspiredm.com/?p=4428#comment-11122</guid>
		<description>I recently spoke to Katrin Eismann and we came to the conclussion that photo retouching is more akin to illustration that photography, despite both of us being trained photographers.

Its imperative that we understand that we are not creating portraits but glamour photograph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently spoke to Katrin Eismann and we came to the conclussion that photo retouching is more akin to illustration that photography, despite both of us being trained photographers.</p>
<p>Its imperative that we understand that we are not creating portraits but glamour photograph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lana</title>
		<link>http://www.inspiredm.com/2009/11/17/what-everybody-ought-to-know-about-digital-photo-retouching/comment-page-1/#comment-10953</link>
		<dc:creator>Lana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspiredm.com/?p=4428#comment-10953</guid>
		<description>I adore retouching - you can make so much with it, but you need to be really accurate to make it realistic. You need to be as good in details as you need to be in seeing &#039;big picture&#039;

About year ago I come across the website of some man who is a professional retoucher and that&#039;s really amazing. His website http://www.iwanexstudio.com/
It&#039;s built not very good in flash, but the portfolio is amazing.

Aaron, I agree with you but only if you work for yourself. If you work for a client, you will HAVE TO change a lot to get the result client wants. And this lot you can&#039;t do only with camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I adore retouching &#8211; you can make so much with it, but you need to be really accurate to make it realistic. You need to be as good in details as you need to be in seeing &#8216;big picture&#8217;</p>
<p>About year ago I come across the website of some man who is a professional retoucher and that&#8217;s really amazing. His website <a href="http://www.iwanexstudio.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.iwanexstudio.com/</a><br />
It&#8217;s built not very good in flash, but the portfolio is amazing.</p>
<p>Aaron, I agree with you but only if you work for yourself. If you work for a client, you will HAVE TO change a lot to get the result client wants. And this lot you can&#8217;t do only with camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holli B</title>
		<link>http://www.inspiredm.com/2009/11/17/what-everybody-ought-to-know-about-digital-photo-retouching/comment-page-1/#comment-10861</link>
		<dc:creator>Holli B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspiredm.com/?p=4428#comment-10861</guid>
		<description>Most of people&#039;s issues about photo retouching have much less to do with removing a blemish than it is reshaping a person&#039;s figure to something unnatural and almost unhealthy. I&#039;ve been devouring fashion magazines for the better part of 30 years and the only earlier complaints I heard (and had) were when they always airbrushed Cindy Crawford&#039;s mole out. The message to me - who has a mole on my face - &quot;That&#039;s ugly. It has to go.&quot;

The came can be said for the airbrushing of hips and thighs and the painting in of ribs. It&#039;s not that these people are fat or even out of shape. They&#039;re human and they&#039;re natural. If you wanted a photograph of a perfectly proportioned android, you should have photographed one. Or put the head of a celebrity on an android&#039;s body.

I believe that photo retouching does have its place in photography, but not in completely reshaping the subjects and the perceptions that can accompany it. But overall, it comes down to the shot, how it&#039;s framed, the artist&#039;s rendering of the subject. I thought that was mostly achieved through the camera lens - not in Photoshop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of people&#8217;s issues about photo retouching have much less to do with removing a blemish than it is reshaping a person&#8217;s figure to something unnatural and almost unhealthy. I&#8217;ve been devouring fashion magazines for the better part of 30 years and the only earlier complaints I heard (and had) were when they always airbrushed Cindy Crawford&#8217;s mole out. The message to me &#8211; who has a mole on my face &#8211; &#8220;That&#8217;s ugly. It has to go.&#8221;</p>
<p>The came can be said for the airbrushing of hips and thighs and the painting in of ribs. It&#8217;s not that these people are fat or even out of shape. They&#8217;re human and they&#8217;re natural. If you wanted a photograph of a perfectly proportioned android, you should have photographed one. Or put the head of a celebrity on an android&#8217;s body.</p>
<p>I believe that photo retouching does have its place in photography, but not in completely reshaping the subjects and the perceptions that can accompany it. But overall, it comes down to the shot, how it&#8217;s framed, the artist&#8217;s rendering of the subject. I thought that was mostly achieved through the camera lens &#8211; not in Photoshop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dzinepress</title>
		<link>http://www.inspiredm.com/2009/11/17/what-everybody-ought-to-know-about-digital-photo-retouching/comment-page-1/#comment-10848</link>
		<dc:creator>Dzinepress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspiredm.com/?p=4428#comment-10848</guid>
		<description>excellent informative stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excellent informative stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DigitalSuture</title>
		<link>http://www.inspiredm.com/2009/11/17/what-everybody-ought-to-know-about-digital-photo-retouching/comment-page-1/#comment-10822</link>
		<dc:creator>DigitalSuture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspiredm.com/?p=4428#comment-10822</guid>
		<description>We have been lying for a long time, this is nothing new or revolutionary

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_of_images_in_the_Soviet_Union

It depends on the morals of the artist and the vision they have.  Did Salvador Dali stay pure with his perspective and realism or did he heighten it?  Did M.C. Escher decide to draw/engrave reality?  Did pin-up artists decide to use a different facial structure instead of their photographic reference?  Did Norman Rockwell think that he would only use his references as a whole, instead of compiling some detail shots to make his final images?  

It has always been about the message and the ability to deliver a vision. The amateurs point out what not do to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have been lying for a long time, this is nothing new or revolutionary</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_of_images_in_the_Soviet_Union" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_of_images_in_the_Soviet_Union</a></p>
<p>It depends on the morals of the artist and the vision they have.  Did Salvador Dali stay pure with his perspective and realism or did he heighten it?  Did M.C. Escher decide to draw/engrave reality?  Did pin-up artists decide to use a different facial structure instead of their photographic reference?  Did Norman Rockwell think that he would only use his references as a whole, instead of compiling some detail shots to make his final images?  </p>
<p>It has always been about the message and the ability to deliver a vision. The amateurs point out what not do to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Hatch</title>
		<link>http://www.inspiredm.com/2009/11/17/what-everybody-ought-to-know-about-digital-photo-retouching/comment-page-1/#comment-10820</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Hatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspiredm.com/?p=4428#comment-10820</guid>
		<description>I do photo restoration, a specialized form of retouching, for a living.  You might want to see the following:

Retouching Ghost Story http://bit.ly/ghoststory

Http://hatchphotofix.com for samples and information about how retouching (restoration) works

http://www.slideshare.net/erichocinc/photo-restoration-slide-show-by-eric-hatch for a little slideshow showing tons of before-and-afters plus some reasons why we do it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do photo restoration, a specialized form of retouching, for a living.  You might want to see the following:</p>
<p>Retouching Ghost Story <a href="http://bit.ly/ghoststory" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/ghoststory</a></p>
<p>Http://hatchphotofix.com for samples and information about how retouching (restoration) works</p>
<p><a href="http://www.slideshare.net/erichocinc/photo-restoration-slide-show-by-eric-hatch" rel="nofollow">http://www.slideshare.net/erichocinc/photo-restoration-slide-show-by-eric-hatch</a> for a little slideshow showing tons of before-and-afters plus some reasons why we do it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiim</title>
		<link>http://www.inspiredm.com/2009/11/17/what-everybody-ought-to-know-about-digital-photo-retouching/comment-page-1/#comment-10818</link>
		<dc:creator>kiim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspiredm.com/?p=4428#comment-10818</guid>
		<description>Aaron B Brown: LAZY photographers dont use photoshp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron B Brown: LAZY photographers dont use photoshp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
